Wednesday, 20 March 2019

"Most Medical Schools Don’t Cover the ECS..."

"When will more medical schools include the second largest neurotransmitter system, the endocannabinoid system (ECS), into medical school curriculum?" article in Huffingtonpost by Dr. David Bearman

In 2013, Cardiologist Dr. David Allen did a preliminary survey to determine which schools teach the ECS and found that only a total of 13 percent of U.S. medical schools even mentioned it. Now, we’re not talking about cannabis here, but a neurotransmitter system that was discovered in the late 1980s, almost 30 years ago. We know that it is critical for homeostasis, yet few medical schools have seen fit to train medical students about it.

Tuesday, 19 March 2019

" Can CBD Converted to THC???"

In a pre-review report by W.H.O we can found some evidence that CBD can be converted to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a Schedule 1 substance under the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances 1971. 
Two main methods have been reported and there has been some investigation into whether this occurs spontaneously in vivo.

Conversion in the laboratory

Under experimental conditions, it has been demonstrated that heating CBD in solutions of some acids catalyses cyclizations within the CBD molecule resulting in delta-9-THC.
Gaoni and Mechoulam have published several papers regarding methods of converting CBD to other cannabinoids including THC, however the yields vary and purity is unclear. 

"Trends in Publications on Medical Cannabis from the Year 2000"


The aim of this study was to compare trends in scientific publication for papers on medical cannabis, papers on cannabis in general, and all papers between the years 2000 and 2017. 

A search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted. The overall number of scientific publications in PubMed increased 2.5-fold. In contrast, the number of publications on cannabis increased 4.5-fold and the number of publications on medical cannabis increased almost 9-fold. The number of publications on medical cannabis in Web of science increased even more (10-fold).

Saturday, 16 March 2019

"The Study On THC and Lung Cancer That Disappeared In The 1970s"

It is frankly shocking that the evidence was emerging in the 70s about the positive effect of the cannabis treatment on cancer and it was not utilized until recently. This may be due to some external factors not really related to science and technology, if you understand what I mean.

THC and lung cancer have been bitter foe since the beginning of time, but we have only officially known about this since 1975.  Unfortunately, soon after the results passed muster of peer review, it all just poofed away. Not a mention, barely a publication, nary an epic news story.

In the early 70s of last century, Richard Nixon ordered a study on the effects of ‘marijuana’ for human health. Things went pretty much in the opposite direction to what he had hoped to reveal. The human lung cancer cultures exposed to cannabis smoke showed detrimental alterations to their DNA synthesis. This was measured by the appearance of chromatin bridges. These bridges make it more likely that a chromosome will break. Researchers hypothesized that THC was interfering  with some crucial cell biochemical process that was damaging lung cancer cells.

Friday, 15 March 2019

"From September 29th, 2014 FDA Had Approved Cannabis For Brain Cancer Treatment... "

On September 29th, 2014, Insys Therapeutics  announced that the United States Food and Drug Administration had granted orphan drug designation to its proprietary cannabidiol product for the treatment of glioma. (A glioma is a type of tumor that starts in the brain or spine.)
CEO of Insys, Michael Babich stated: “We will most likely focus initially on pontine glioma, or PG, which has multiple similarities with glioblastoma multiforme, for which our pharmaceutical CBD was granted ODD last month. We believe that this product has excellent potential as treatment for PG, and look forward to advancing its development and offering a potential efficacious treatment for patients.”
Insys, which has more than seven years of research and development experience in the pharmaceutical cannabinoid space, manufactures pharmaceutical CBD and pharmaceutical dronabinol (THC), both of which are cannabinoids, at its FDA-inspected and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) approved facility in Round Rock, Texas. 
The company recently submitted a Drug Master File (DMF #28255) for its CBD active pharmaceutical ingredient and believes that it is the only U.S.-based company with the capacity to produce pharmaceutical cannabinoids in scalable quantities.
Insys was previously granted ODD to its pharmaceutical CBD for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common and most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor in humans, and two rare forms of epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet Syndrome. 
Insys is also evaluating the potential use of pharmaceutical CBD in several additional indications, including: adult epilepsy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and addiction in cocaine, amphetamines and opioids. Insys intends to pursue orphan drug designation for other indications that may qualify.
Orphan drug designation is granted by the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) to novel drugs or biologics that treat rare diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the U.S. The designation provides the drug developer with a seven-year period of U.S. marketing exclusivity, as well as certain financial incentives that can help support its development.
This progress is impressively significant, but there is still much to be desired.
First, cannabinoids work best when used together, so a CBD-only treatment will probably yield poorer results than a formula with CBD, THC, and the dozens of other cannabinoids. We all know that the CBD being used by Insys is synthetic. While organic whole-plant, full-spectrum cannabis extracts are best, the FDA approval for CBD alone is still a major step.
The scientific and anecdotal evidence supporting glioma treatment with cannabis is quite strong.
Dr.Manuel Guzman from Spain is well known for his study showing how THC induces programmed cell death in glioma cells. CBD has also been shown to kill some types of glioma cell lines in addition to inhibiting migrationproliferationgrowthinvasion,and angiogenesis. With such powerful properties, it’s no surprise that anecdotal evidence is supportive.
Sophie Ryan, an optic pathway glioma patient, has been featured in the journal O’Shaughnessy’s, with documentation supporting amazing anticancer effects of cannabinoids (THC & CBD) against her tumor. While she was also on chemotherapy, the traditional treatment was only expected to stabilize the tumor, not shrink it. 
Another observational study in the same journal documents an optic pathway glioma reducing more than 95% in 16 months; in this case, cannabis oil was the sole treatment.
For years, many other people have reported amazing success against brain cancers with cannabis oil. It is undeniable that this is working, at least in some cases. Given this reality, cannabis extracts should be made available to any brain cancer patient who desires it, and clinical testing should begin immediately to optimize cannabis treatment.